SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (7795)3/15/2006 3:51:34 PM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
These thoughts of your's are what as known as discrimination, discrimination between the real and the unreal which leads to liberation.



To: GraceZ who wrote (7795)3/17/2006 10:17:41 AM
From: Ron DiorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 24758
 
<It was one of those things that seemed illogical, like the Catholic concept of being born with original sin. I never bought that concept even when I was a small child studying my Catechism. The idea that an individual should carry blame, solely on the basis of having been born (male or otherwise), for things done by other men doesn't set well with me.>

Blame is the wrong word. Burden is more accurate. The problem with the “Catholic concept” is that they try and use “blame” because this term has a scaring effect to get others to do what they want. It’s the same way they use the teaching of hell (a word that is not even in the actual Bible). God knew this passed down defect was not fair and thus sent his son to earth who “died for all” taking away sins burden. Being born with a defect or being “blamed” and held accountable for being born with a defect are two different things. The latter is unreasonable.

Grace I too would like to commend you on your unpopular thoughts about women. I’ve always said “I don’t wish women to be higher or lower than men. Just Different!” One can be equal and still be different.