Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (183569)	3/15/2006 4:49:28 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

If we couldnt do the Dubai deal, how can the arabs trust us to protect us from the persians? The Pakistanis would be in a very interesting position. After all Khan helped the iranians get this far but since the Paks are Sunnis, they might feel it necessary to level the playing field over there, no?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (183569)	3/15/2006 6:38:23 PM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I agree with you. That's a first eh?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (183569)	3/16/2006 6:06:20 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hawk, you don't seem to have read past the part of my post which said that Iran should have a tactical nuclear bomb as you seem to think that would involve an Arab arms race. I don't think any others would want one on the terms which I thought Iran should have one. You should read the fine print. <The nuclear bomb would sit in the foundations underneath the reactor, being a nice safe place where it wouldn't get lost. If Iran shot, gaoled or otherwise removed the supervisor [supervisors probably], then the nuclear bomb controller back in Moscow would disassemble the reactor so that the materials wouldn't be taken for wrongful purposes contrary to the agreement. > Mqurice