Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (732621)	3/17/2006 7:38:16 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I can easily address your question, but you have continued to ignore mine, why didn't clinton take bin laden when he had three opportunities? Now, to your question: Bush has not yet failed on his promise to capture bin laden, there is no deadline, you can't be impatient about this, in a "fast food" society we seem to be impatient about everything... indeed, the same was said about hitler during WWII, and he was never captured (or assassinated) despite several attempts, yet we still fought and defeated his army... bin laden is only one single individual, his capture may be an emotional victory, however briefly, but like thousands of cockroaches, capturing just one means little, al quaida has numerous cells worldwide, bin laden was head of it but he had created the organization so that each cell has its own head... if you focus only on the one individual, you will trip over yourself and miss the bigger picture, that is extinguishing those elements that have sworn and already tried to bring the West down... GZ