SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (14755)3/19/2006 2:59:46 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542907
 
I had that debate many times in graduate school; some people chose to work inside the system and others outside, for the reasons you and Tom have spelled out. There is no clear answer.

It is difficult if not impossible to force real, lasting change from outside. At the same time, the system itself has an internal inertia and institutional history that deflects and derails many of the attempts to change it.

So there is no clear solution. I admire both Bono and Simpson for taking the stands they did. People do what they feel is best to promote their cause and keep their integrity intact at the same time. The important thing is that people somewhere make the effort.

That said, my time in the system left me largely uninterested in changing it from inside our outside. I have little or no faith in politicians or most of the partisan activists on the outside. Certainly, until the partisan games of the last 25 years are squelched, little if any lasting change will be effected.



To: epicure who wrote (14755)3/19/2006 12:58:44 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542907
 
Big picture things are difficult, but smaller, narrowly focused agenda items are attainable if you can get a lawmaker's ear. I don't know what Bono currently wants to get through, but why should it matter which party he approaches in his effort to advance the agenda? The issue is more important to him than party factionalism. That should be admired, yes?