Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (280811)	3/19/2006 8:57:21 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575901

bin Laden hated Saddam. This is well-known in international circles. It's unfortunate the USA is so dependent upon oil Bush had to manufacture a reason to attack Iraq.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (280811)	3/19/2006 11:20:11 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575901

The "source" of those papers is an unnamed Afghani quoting an unnamed Iraqi counsel. The timing is very convienient. You really WANT to believe them, don't you MM?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (280811)	3/20/2006 2:35:14 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575901

Obviously, you didn't read the Pentagon papers. It didn't talk about WMDs. It talked about direct contact from Saddam to Al Qaeda and collusion to jointly strike the U.S. So are you saying the Pentagon forged those papers? MM, its crap. Saddam met with Rumsfeld on a couple of occasions. Does that make Rumsfeld a member of Saddam's inner court? I don't think so. Desperately, Bush and the GOP have looked for ways to link Saddam to al Qaida. It hasn't worked because it didn't happen. Read my lips: this war is a joke and a waste of the lives of good American soldiers and good American money. And when this is all said and done, I want the GOP to pay for this huge mistake.