SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (195)3/21/2006 8:10:46 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
I agree with your post. Those 3,000 would not have wanted 300 million Americans to lose the guarantees of the Bill of Rights. You're right. 9/11 was never the REASON for invading Iraq. It was an excuse to lead us into the war Bush planned all along. I was actually opposed to our invading Afghanistan. It seemed like a lost cause to me, a lost cause that had already brought the Soviet Union to an end...THAT was a positive result, though. Our goal there was to get Osama and his fellow terrorists whom that govt. purportedly harbored. None of which has been accomplished, and now Bush has created a new haven and breeding grown for terrorists, Iraq.

IMO, not enough has been done to find out what REALLY happened 9/11. And just now, we learn that the FBI could have thwarted the perps, but because of bureaucratic egomania, that didn't happen. And are we any safer from a terrorist attack now then we were then. Absolutely, NO. Homeland Security got a D-, which equals complete failure to protect us.

Yep, our prisons house one/sixth of the world's prison population. And yet Americans only comprise about five percent of the world....are we that bad! that so many need to be locked up?!!!

My dad was a meteoroglogist stationed in Hawaii, after a couple of years, he was sent to the South Pacific, where he got "jungle rot." I'm not sure what that was, and I don't know much more than that, as I never really asked, and he's gone now. Once a priest whom he'd met in Guam came to dinner. I don't even know how my dad got to be friends with him. He wasn't even Catholic. BUT, he was a great guy and the best dad in the world. And I know he'd be appalled to at what's happened to this great nation for which he and your dad fought. :(



To: epicure who wrote (195)3/21/2006 8:17:50 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
"My father fought in the Pacific, partly to protect "our way of life"- and our way of life includes the freedom not to be spied on as if we were citizens of Soviet Russia"

Your fathers biggest mistake was having you as a daughter. He must be turning over in his grave.



To: epicure who wrote (195)3/22/2006 6:41:33 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
Your father fought in the Pacific because of an attack which took fewer lives than 911. And he did it despite FDR locking up all the Japanese-ancestry citizens on the west coast without even being charged with a crime. Now that was a REAL violation of the Constitution.

Its pretty clear based on his actions your father would not see things the way you do.