SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: skinowski who wrote (131087)3/23/2006 3:45:17 PM
From: cybersaavy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Giving the bulls the benefit of the doubt here with this irregular flat count implying that a new local low might be a buying opportunity. What I have labeled b could be a fiver instead suggesting something more sinister afoot.

ttrader.com

cs



To: skinowski who wrote (131087)3/23/2006 7:26:32 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
Similarities between today's bubble poster child $HGX and the $NDX in 2000:

============

Yes. In my mind, the ideal short entry was NOT March 2000. Nobody with any respect for market momentum would have done that. One had to wait for the extreme weakness in April 2000 to see that the bubble was bursting. Then the optimum short entries were the 38% or 50% retracement levels hit three times, in June, July, and August.

stockcharts.com

Alternately, one could have witnessed the destruction going on in tech and used it to time a near perfect $SPX short entry at the end of August 2000:

stockcharts.com

You would have sold within a few percent of the all-time high.

I guess I view the housing sector as the focal point of the present debt bubble, much as tech was the focal point of the debt bubble in 2000. So, I would argue that the wisest course is to watch for real downside momentum in homebuilders, and then short them near a corrective retracement. Also, short stocks in downstream industries when the homebuilders are at that point.

Actually, it's curious that the Jan2006 high is five months after the peak here:
stockcharts.com

much as the August 2000 high is five months after the peak here:
stockcharts.com

$HGX retraced further, around 80% compared to $NDX 60%. But the general idea is the same.

Hmmmm.......

BC



To: skinowski who wrote (131087)3/23/2006 7:56:57 PM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Interesting interpretation.