Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (74765)	3/24/2006 11:28:58 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan harbor terrorists. Those are Bush's two best pals in the region. Saddam was an enemy of all radical Islamic Jihadists. He killed thousands of them and during the reagan years, we approved. Saddam only started reaching out to Jihadists in an insincere way when GW Bush was rattling sabers and saying he was the axis of evil. And Iraq only tilted to the extremists when GW was talking about the Axis Of Evil. North Korea too got more dangerous after that stupid speech. Bush was trying to incite some kind of crusade Armageddon war. Yet he had no plan to back it up but chaos, political spin and deficit-spending a trillion dollars. If you want someone to blame for most of the mess in the Middle East right now look no further than Bush-Cheney-Rumsfield. Saddam may have been very bad but he did not cause the damage to ME stability and the US military we're seeing now. Bush has damaged the US military more than any enemy could.

To: Dan B. who wrote (74765)	3/25/2006 3:36:17 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Who said Saddam was in league with Al Qaeda. We have been waiting for these years for evidence on WMD, Al Qaeda etc. And there is no proof or evidence of that. How can Bush ever claim to be an expert on these things when he botched a simple thing which declare major combat overe years ahead. If he and his staff could not correctly assess the state on the ground and came out to declare to the American public that major combat is over, then what grounds de we have to trust Bush's judgement and fact finding capability when he says Saddam was in league with Al Qaeda when we know that Saddam was a secularist and Al Qaeda were Islamic fundamentalists. These two don't go together. Simple common sense which is generally absent in rural US which is where you are from I presume.