Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (162062)	3/25/2006 8:59:26 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 793983

seems to be THE choice to be made, coal or nuclear to get off oil...

To: LindyBill who wrote (162062)	3/25/2006 9:21:10 PM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793983

Why don't they use ethanol to make ethanol? The argument about how much energy it makes versus what it uses would be answered rather quickly if they just burned their own fuel and sold what was left over.

To: LindyBill who wrote (162062)	3/25/2006 9:52:20 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793983

We have to start converting from petroleum some where, and first starts typically are not too efficient. But if you don't make the first start, when DO you make a change? The Natural Resources Defense Council needs to come up with some solutions, because from here it looks like they are part of the problem.