SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Slagle who wrote (5289)4/4/2006 3:39:01 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218633
 
Its very likely that Pete Wilson was acting on behalf of Enron in creating the "energy de-regulation" fiasco in California.

Its very similar to the way that Ronald Reagan, who lived in a small home, purchased a very large ranch in Santa Barbara for many millions of dollars on his $50k annual salary as Governor of California. $50k would not have paid the interest on even a $1 million loan, let alone the entire purchase price of the ranch. Its amazing how very few people find that odd. But like most very corrupt people, Reagan talked a lot about decency and integrity. He fooled quite a lot of people.

In San Diego, "donor corporations" and their chief employees merely made the maximum allowable political contributions to Pete Wilson's re-election campaign as Mayor of San Diego. These limits are far more generous than those allowed for Governor or Federal office.

If Pete Wilson had not come knocking on their door suggesting city approvals for certain projects in return for the maximum allowed campaign contribution, the home builder I worked for never would have donated even one cent to his campaign. Most other corporate donors were probably in the same boat. They were all very foolish to give "campaign contributions" to a politician they knew was crooked. Most ended up with nothing in return for their money.
.