SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (184842)4/8/2006 9:01:28 PM
From: Dennis O'Bell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I wonder if, as with global warming, we've passed the tipping point on the state of our country. I still don't see anyone figuring out how to deal with the lack of competitiveness.

If you think it's bad here, consider France.

If we keep on outsourcing jobs, what exactly will we use to finance all of these imperialistic ambitions?

Actually I'm kind of tired of hearing about this "imperialistic" nonsense. Imperialism implies expanding the borders of a country, in the manner that Old Europe was so famous for. The US has not been and never will be an imperialistic colonial empire.

Bush's game has nothing to do with imperialism. It has to do with lining the pockets of the wealthy, and locking in ideological control of the country (in the manner of that latest book "Painting the Map Red").

Bush (and above all Cheney and the neocons) could care less if things f***k up bigtime in Iraq, as long as at the end they can exploit the situation for ideological and monetary profit. They all know they can bullshit their way out of the problems over there, as they've been doing all along so far.

Unless their luck runs out and they lose control of Congress in the coming elections.



To: geode00 who wrote (184842)4/8/2006 11:01:39 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Message 22340480



To: geode00 who wrote (184842)4/9/2006 2:17:18 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
The Leaker in Chief?
_________________________________________________________________

Is he a CEO who stays above the fray? Or did he give the go-ahead to strike back at critics over prewar intel? A presidential mystery.

msnbc.msn.com