Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (5425)	4/9/2006 9:17:13 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217591

Contingency plans like this are very normal. On the other hand, Bush never makes empy threats; he has specifically said he will use force if necessary to prevent Iran from getting the bomb. He is to be taken at his word on this, something the Iranians and others don't understand thanks to their culture of lie, cheat, and steal. He is in his second term, no longer cares about the political effects on him of such an action. Finally, he doesn't want to leave the Irnian problem at the footsteps of a new President. Bombing of Iran is therefore in my estimation almost a certainty unless the Iranowackos starting cowering, which won't happen thanks to the fantasy world they inhabit. Their religion is at present a cult, more specifically, a death cult. Your job, should you choose to accept it, is to tell us how the Mullahs will affect our moolah. My thoughts, all on an obvious basis: 1.- Oil up; 2.- Gold up; 3.- Stocks down. Yours?