Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (19590)	4/25/2006 3:24:28 AM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

I am wondering why......since even Dana Priest doesn't even know for sure.......why is it that we can't call them alledged "secret prisons" rather just the "secret prisons" since it hasn't been proven that they even exist? And I like this allot.... Finally, several bloggers are speculating about the possibility that the whole "secret prisons" story might have been a sting operation by the CIA designed to catch a leaker. I don't think this can be true, based mosly on public statements that have been made by intelligence officials, but it is a curious fact that there doesn't seem to be any evidence for the existence of the secret prisons other than Dana Priest's story. Can it be that this is one secret the CIA has actually been able to keep, but for the leak? Maybe that is why we heard so many groans come out of the dept when Peter Goss took over the reins.