Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (185695)	4/26/2006 2:29:40 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

>> Is there a reason you're not addressing the information directly from one of Saddam's inner circle... Yes. I don't know much about it and will take me time to investigate all the issues around it. There may well have been good reasons to invade Iraq. I just never heard them articulated coherently from the administration...and the discussion is now academic anyway. What is significant though, is that pro-invasion information, no matter how skimpy, no matter how poor of a forgery or how weak of a plagiarism managed to find its way to the highest levels but the anti-invasion opinions were scrutinized differently. Why was that? Shouldn't it have been the other way around?