Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (186171)	5/4/2006 5:20:27 PM
From: see clearly now	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Thanks Hawkmoon. I appreciate that response. There appears to have been evidence that the information to get the UN on side as well as a compliant congress was cooked and perhaps once again is being cooked!....and that lots of other International laws was well as US laws are being deliberately broken in the "war on terror" ...surely you agree there is some truth to this? I can understand that a nation such as the US is now desperate to control the sources and transportation routes re oil which is now becoming a scarce resource (in hind sight it is to bad the energy policies created under Carter's Administration were not adhered to by the next administration ..continuity seems to be a unique problem with so called democratic governments)..think where we could be now with the US leading the way in conserving energy use and new energy related technologies rather then hanging on to and having to defend the oil fueled economy. So now we go to war over oil at a great cost in life and limb and at a great risk of another century of wars of attrition and good sensible people like ourselves arguing about a fait accompi!! Personally I think its to late for reason to prevail In the present US Civil (Interesting word in this context) Government's Position (its our way or the Highway) and only a military coupe in the US will allow communication with the so called adversary in Iran..Their Military leader(s) as I understand it have publicaly said they are not on side with there present leader as to his threats which in fact would make them a bluff!. Any Merit in this at all? Arni