SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Vet who wrote (10722)5/7/2006 2:24:34 AM
From: jackjc  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78421
 
Of course very long term silver can be expected to maintain
and increase its dollar adjusted value, similar to gold,
and even better in some ways.

Yes 50 silver today would not be the same as 50 silver was
then. But people always talk as if that was a valid peak price.

But the Hunt squeeze was a special case. Maybe the new ETF
can repeat it, dunno.

But it was only valid for an instant, not long enough to be
taken advantage of, a number only, of no use to more than
a tiny fraction of 1% of the worlds silver holders to take
advantage of. Adjusted today, you would need $100/oz. And
silver investors expect to see a similar price again AND
EXPECT TO BE ABLE TO SELL AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT.

I don't expect that, but expect to continue to make great
silver gains as I have so far in Corner Bay, SSRI, MGN,
GPR, ECU, GGC, and many others.

I am trying to get across that short spikes give the illusion
of a valid price that we could benefit by.

And that the height of that squeeze will not necessarily be
repeated any time soon, and should not be counted on.

The silver buying mania then was instantly met with a selling
mania of lines of people stretching around the block outside
of pawn and coin shops, which demolished the silver bull for
a decade.