Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (66699)	5/7/2006 5:41:36 PM
From: DayTraderKidd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361305

Keery has statements on all sides of this war. With that said, this country would be much better off if he were to have won the election and even better off if Gore won the election. If kerry were in office on 911 we would not be in Iraq right now and we would have more united states and less divided states. Still, they defined him as being on both sides of the isle based on his own actions and statements.

To: American Spirit who wrote (66699)	5/7/2006 6:59:51 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361305

"No, Kerry was never for this war." Tell it to the Globe. And tell them he hasn't burnished his credentials one little bit with progressives. ================================= Likewise, Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts has renounced his own vote in favor of the Iraq war. He has also proposed an exit strategy for Iraq. His troop withdrawal plan is ''among the most aggressive and progressive. Without a doubt, John Kerry has burnished his Iraq credentials for progressives," says Tom Mattzie, Washington director of MoveOn.org, which had the nation's fourth-richest PAC in 2005. boston.com