SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (287181)5/9/2006 6:46:56 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575120
 
U.S. Newborn Survival Rate Ranks Low By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer
2 hours, 22 minutes ago


America may be the world's superpower, but its survival rate for newborn babies ranks near the bottom among modern nations, better only than Latvia.

Among 33 industrialized nations, the United States is tied with Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slovakia with a death rate of nearly 5 per 1,000 babies, according to a new report. Latvia's rate is 6 per 1,000.

"We are the wealthiest country in the world, but there are still pockets of our population who are not getting the health care they need," said Mary Beth Powers, a reproductive health adviser for the U.S.-based Save the Children, which compiled the rankings based on health data from countries and agencies worldwide.

The U.S. ranking is driven partly by racial and income health care disparities. Among U.S. blacks, there are 9 deaths per 1,000 live births, closer to rates in developing nations than to those in the industrialized world.

"Every time I see these kinds of statistics, I'm always amazed to see where the United States is because we are a country that prides itself on having such advanced medical care and developing new technology ... and new approaches to treating illness. But at the same time not everybody has access to those new technologies," said Dr. Mark Schuster, a Rand Co. researcher and pediatrician with the University of California, Los Angeles.

The Save the Children report, released Monday, comes just a week after publication of another report humbling to the American health care system. That study showed that white, middle-aged Americans are far less healthy than their peers in England, despite U.S. health care spending that is double that in England.

In the analysis of global infant mortality, Japan had the lowest newborn death rate, 1.8 per 1,000 and four countries tied for second place with 2 per 1,000 — the Czech Republic, Finland, Iceland and Norway.

Still, it's the impoverished nations that feel the full brunt of infant mortality, since they account for 99 percent of the 4 million annual deaths of babies in their first month. Only about 16,000 of those are in the United States, according to Save the Children.

The highest rates globally were in Africa and South Asia. With a newborn death rate of 65 out of 1,000 live births, Liberia ranked the worst.

In the United States, researchers noted that the population is more racially and economically diverse than many other industrialized countries, making it more challenging to provide culturally appropriate health care.

About half a million U.S. babies are born prematurely each year, data show. African-American babies are twice as likely as white infants to be premature, to have a low birth weight, and to die at birth, according to Save the Children.

The researchers also said lack of national health insurance and short maternity leaves likely contribute to the poor U.S. rankings. Those factors can lead to poor health care before and during pregnancy, increasing risks for premature births and low birth weight, which are the leading causes of newborn death in industrialized countries. Infections are the main culprit in developing nations, the report said.

Other possible factors in the U.S. include teen pregnancies and obesity rates, which both disproportionately affect African-American women and also increase risk for premature births and low birth weights.

In past reports by Save the Children — released ahead of Mother's Day — U.S. mothers' well-being has consistently ranked far ahead of those in developing countries but poorly among industrialized nations. This year the United States tied for last place with the United Kingdom on indicators including mortality risks and contraception use.

While the gaps for infants and mothers contrast sharply with the nation's image as a world leader, Emory University health policy expert Kenneth Thorpe said the numbers are not surprising.

"Our health care system focuses on providing high-tech services for complicated cases. We do this very well," Thorpe said. "What we do not do is provide basic primary and preventive health care services. We do not pay for these services, and do not have a delivery system that is designed to provide either primary prevention, or adequately treat patients with chronic diseases."

___

On the Net:

Save the Children: savethechildren.org



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (287181)5/9/2006 7:06:55 AM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1575120
 
The Pretenders
After five straight years of profligacy, Republicans are desperately trying to portray themselves as the defenders of budget discipline. The challenge is driving them to new heights of hypocrisy.

President Bush is threatening a veto — which would be his first — of an "emergency" spending bill because senators have bulked it up by $14 billion more than he had requested. But at the same time, the White House has been hounding Congressional Republicans to do whatever it takes, including blatant budget gimmickry, to pass $70 billion worth of additional tax cuts, among them a wholly gratuitous extension of special low tax rates for investors. And Mr. Bush is going to the barricades over $14 billion?

Meanwhile, Senator John McCain recently proclaimed victory in the war on pork when the Senate stripped from the emergency spending bill $15 million that would have gone to a seafood marketing campaign. That's fine, but it won't quite pay off the multibillion-dollar tax cuts for investors that Mr. McCain, in his new presidential candidate persona, has decided to embrace.

Senator Judd Gregg, the chairman of the Budget Committee, has warned that the nation "simply cannot continue on the path to higher deficits." But there's no indication that he's willing to block the path by refusing to bless the gimmicks that allow his party to pretend the pending tax cut package doesn't affect the bottom line.

And Senator Charles Grassley, the chairman of the Finance Committee, describes himself as a dyed-in-the-wool fiscal conservative. But right now Mr. Grassley is maneuvering to add a second tax cut package to the mix, enlarging the deficit by a further $20 billion, or more.

There was a time that the Republican Party stood for fiscal restraint, but that boat has long since left the dock. Now, as its leaders prepare to inflate the deficit even more, the least they could do is refrain from pretending they care.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (287181)5/9/2006 2:40:21 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575120
 
For me personally, I want to err on the side of more personal freedom.

You will lose more freedom to a powerful individual than to an elected government. Only a fool would think that a weak government means nobody is filling that power vaccum.

TP