Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (186356)	5/9/2006 9:20:31 AM
From: Lou Weed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Maurice, You've gotta be a big fan of Douglas Adams?? You're writing style and reasoning are very similar. Very clever econometric analysis and a fabulous "taking the mickey" quotient. Keep up the good work. MON.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (186356)	5/9/2006 12:00:33 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>" PS: It's not just the value of the SUVs, it's the value they produce as well. They can produce a LOT of CO2 and maybe that would be just enough to avoid the next glaciation. These things are not linear and the straw that breaks the camel's back could tip us into freezing. I would NOT want to abandon the SUVs and be responsible for not just the loss of the SUVs, but also the initiation of a glaciation which could cost a LOT more than 1 x 5 year old child. I know this economic, engineering and environmental econometric analysis is too complex for most to understand, but hopefully you can grasp the basic ideas. We sophisticated international financial relativity theorists have trouble explaining our complex ideas to the layman [and lay-woman]. "<< Yup Maurice, your caffeine level is getting low again.