SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (287319)5/9/2006 6:56:20 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577232
 
re: I thought you where a proponent of the peak oil theory (that we are nearing a peak), but looking through your posts I see you don't directly endorse it.

You do post someone else's comments supporting the peak oil idea but you don't say "I think the peak production of oil will come in the near future", or anything like that. So you did not make the prediction, you just passed along someone else's.


I suspect "peak oil theory" may be true, but I certainly wouldn't presume to know. Hell, the "experts" disagree. And "just in case", with 25% of the world's consumption, it would be in our best interests to take some action. The downside, if it's true, in huge.

re: You have also directly predicted that certain tax changes would greatly reduce our dependence on imported oil

True, but that's just the start of my "predictions". It would also reduce the cost of oil, reduce the trade deficit, reduce the income of "enemy countries"...

re: and you've predicted that the situation in Iraq would get worse for some time

Since before the war... and it has.

re: You have also at least past along predictions about future trade and budget deficits.

I don't remember; did they come true?

re: I can't look in to a crystal ball and have certain knowledge of the future. But I can look at Iraq and the situation there and the nature of our involvement there and see that there is very little likelihood of the situation ever resulting in as many American deaths as Vietnam.

Maybe, maybe not. It could turn into a multi-country Middle East ethnic and religious war, in which we play a major part. It could just be a Korea, with only 10,000 US kids dead. For sure it looks like it's going for the rest of the Bush admin, and you can't expect it to end on a dime at the end of that admin, so a WAG is 6,000 dead and 46,000 total American casualties, at best. If things stay as they are, and we elect a hawk, say, McCain, then double that. If things break bad in the Middle East, a distinct possibility, there is no telling. Could be much worse than Vietnam.

John