Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 8bits who wrote (6274)	5/11/2006 1:24:46 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220168

With the reduced other noxious gases, maybe an increase in NOX wouldn't be too bad, meaning catalytic converters could be avoided. Maybe NOX acceptable levels have been set too low. Catalytic converters are so entrenched that other ideas can't even be considered these days. Because catalytic converters were a good idea 30 years ago, doesn't mean they are still a good idea. Engines have changed a LOT in that time. Fuel technology has done too. Mqurice