SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (5756)5/11/2006 5:02:24 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14758
 
First, let me make it clear that my main problem here is another illegal leak of classified info that harms national security while we are at war is plastered on the front page of every major paper. The illegal leak & the illegal reporting of it were done by lunatic libs who wish to harm Bush by any means necessary. That outrages me to no end!

RE: your reply - The article specifically said they "do not listen in" to or record calls. Instead they track the numbers called to certain countries for patterns that match those of known/suspected terrorists.

Under those circumstances there can be no expectation of privacy.


President Bush Discusses NSA Surveillance Program

Diplomatic Reception Room
Office of the Press Secretary
May 11, 2006

THE PRESIDENT: After September the 11th, I vowed to the American people that our government would do everything within the law to protect them against another terrorist attack. As part of this effort, I authorized the National Security Agency to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations. In other words, if al Qaeda or their associates are making calls into the United States or out of the United States, we want to know what they're saying.

Today there are new claims about other ways we are tracking down al Qaeda to prevent attacks on America. I want to make some important points about what the government is doing and what the government is not doing.

First, our international activities strictly target al Qaeda and their known affiliates. Al Qaeda is our enemy, and we want to know their plans.

Second, the government does not listen to domestic phone calls without court approval.

Third, the intelligence activities I authorized are lawful and have been briefed to appropriate members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat.

Fourth, the privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities.

We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans. Our efforts are focused on links to al Qaeda and their known affiliates. So far we've been very successful in preventing another attack on our soil.

As a general matter, every time sensitive intelligence is leaked, it hurts our ability to defeat this enemy. Our most important job is to protect the American people from another attack, and we will do so within the laws of our country.

Thank you.

whitehouse.gov



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (5756)5/12/2006 11:08:27 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 

How can they tell how's on the phone without "listening to"?


Their datamining for what number calls what number.

"Among other things, there’s no expectation of privacy."
That is in direct contradiction of the findings of the USSC in Roe v. Wade.


Roe v. Wade, in addition to being horrible constitutional jurisprudence, doesn't assert any expectation of privacy in this situation or in any similar situation.