SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (48552)5/17/2006 11:32:05 AM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 90947
 
Which Clinton? The one we already had inflicted on us? Or the one who wants to inflict herself on us?


I would have trusted Clinton in office, more than Gore.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (48552)5/17/2006 1:19:23 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
"Libya would have nuclear weapons ..."

Speaking of ..., everyone should read today's WSJ column by Judith Miller, "Gadhafi's Leap of Faith", on the Bush Administration's diplomatic master-stroke of de-WMDing Libya. They were so close to having a working nuclear bomb - developing it even while subject to sanctions - they make Iran look like a bunch of amateurs. They also had active chemical and long-range missile programs, and the column demonstrates how easy it is to hide all such programs from prying eyes.

This reality must drive the "Bush is incompetent and doesn't do diplomacy" crowd downright batty -er- battier. CD is a sad and painful affliction, isn't it? ;-)

Here's the link: online.wsj.com



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (48552)5/17/2006 9:55:18 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 90947
 
Hey, consider the source. "Idiot" doesn't begin to cover it.

I think you're wrong. We'd be a colony of Afghanistan. :-)

Libya would have nuclear weapons
Iran too. You forget Iran.

OXY petroleum would be one of the largest oil companies in the world (since Gore has a lot of stock in the company).
Yep.

I would have trusted Clinton in office, more than Gore.

And look at his old man. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (48552)5/18/2006 9:26:03 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 90947
 
ROTFL - The left practices revisionist history so much they don't know what really happened. Gore advisors were going public after 911 saying they were glad that President Bush was in office instead of Gore, because he was doing a better job than they believe Gore could have. Sources said at the time that those who wouldn't go public with that opinion felt the same way.