Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (51994)	5/17/2006 11:38:14 AM
From: Rollocaster	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 312999

«they still have almost the same money as they did 4 years ago. That is an achievment» A question for you: Clearly this stock is «loved» by some, but there is a growing understandable disenchantment. That is also clear. I'm not a banker, nor a geologist, nor a miner, but what's the purpose of holding that much money for so long, if it's not at least to spend it on drilling programs aimed at proving what everybody, who loves it, seem to believe... As a shareholder, i would also like to see more results. I fail to see RR's logic in that regard. Or i'm failing at understanding what it means to hold that «extraordinary» money for that long... to no apparent avail! Can you clarify this for me? Thanks! Un lester parmi tant d'autre...

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (51994)	5/17/2006 2:10:50 PM
From: Cage Rattler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 312999

I know you have followed this puppy for some time now, as have I, but let me ask you how does one explain CKG's noteworthy weakness during the recent gold-miner run up? It's not looking too strong from where I'm sitting. I'm not suggesting they run out and hire an advertising firm to promote the stock; however, I strongly suggest the get off their asses and post materials that are of obvious concern to equity holders. Bottom-line the stock holders own the company and are due the common courtesy of timely updates. Any secretary with some posting experience could do this. With all due respect to RR and his expertise, his past record of misleading folks, by passive-aggressively doing nothing and failing to inform or misleading "over-the-phone" comments (such as FGX and it's "momentary listing" on the Toronto exchange) that turn out to be bullshit. Any information gleaned is beaten out of them and oft times, worthless. Ultimately the failure to file in December is CEO's responsibility and attests to his inattentiveness or worse.