Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (8624)	5/17/2006 7:23:23 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 71588

There is definitely proof Paula Jones was paid for. Her expenses for that year must have been in the $500,000 range and she had no source if income to even begin to pay for that. Also the fact she had top-level propagandists of the right like Anne Coulter writing up her testimonies. Anne doesn't come cheap. What there is no proof of is that any of Jones's allegations had any basis in fact. At best, it's biased hearsay and he-said, she-said, and a deliberate attempt by her financiers to smear the president no matter what the outcome of the "trial". It's another form of a smear campaign, to get the victim of the smear to deny it, or not deny it. Either way, he loses. Get it?

To: TimF who wrote (8624)	5/17/2006 7:44:47 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

The real culprit in the Paula Jones (and other 10 year old allegation bimbo cases) was Mellon-Scaife, the far rightwing billionaire owner of Newsmax, one of the top smear sites on the internet. Mellon-Scaife's "Arkansas Project" offered $$$$ to anyone who would come forward with sexual or other complaints against Clinton, just as the trumped-up BS Whitewater charges were being leveled in congress. It was all coordinated. Why? Because Clinton was so popular and successful. Only reason. Mellon-Scaife should be put on trial for what he did. He and the others who pushed all those trumped-up allegations against Clinton, including, rape, murder and drug-running. Every single allegation was baseless. As James Carville said, if you drag dollar bills through trailer-parks there's no telling who will try and grab them. One thing we know, the State Troopers who testified were paid, and so was Jones. So were all of them no doubt. Did Clinton bang Jones? Probably. Maybe he even pulled out his dick. So what? What was she doing in his room? Was she in any way harmed? The Judge said no even if all of her impossible to prove or disporove allegations were true. So why did Jones sue? And who paid her $500,000 or so in legal bills, plus her makeover, plastic surgery and all the other expenses? Who paid for Anne Coulter and the "Elves" to write up Jone's testimonies and spread more filth about Clinton, including descriptions of his curved penis? Who did all this and paid for it and why? The answer is obvious. CLinton only paid off Paula Jones as blackmail/extortion, to get her to shut up rather than drag it out. Unfortunately in this country any woman has the right to sue any man for "rape" or "harrassment" if she just prove they could have been in the same place at the same time, then then burden of proof falls to the man who usually has no way of disproving anything. Similar to proving exactly what happended in the heat of combat 40 years after the fact. Understand the rightwing smear logic now?