Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (66342)	5/19/2006 11:46:02 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 173976

He won't read that. I doubt anyone on the right will read it.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (66342)	5/19/2006 1:19:15 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Apparently, you need a remdial reading course.....You are a lying scumbag. Proof positive follows. The document does not say the authors "desired" a Pearl Harbor as you stated. Quoting page 51: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one absent some catastpophic and crystallizing event -like a new Pearl Harbor." Here is what you said......lying vermin that you are..... It is interesting that only a year before 9/11 the PNAC had expressed their desire for a “catastrophic and catalysing event - a new Pearl Harbor,” without which they themselves admitted that such an extreme and warlike agenda would never win public support or congressional approval. Your statement was an outright lie and you knew it when you made it.....you are lower than whale dung. Go seek the psychiatic help you need to overcome your teritary BDS. F'ing lying scumbag.