Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (198008)	5/19/2006 5:36:50 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

why don't you make one post with some more content Your post was content-free. Why not use PM? I'm sorry if you don't like the link to Conroe o/c-ing to 4GHz, but it was content.

To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (198008)	5/19/2006 5:48:11 PM
From: gzubeck	Respond to of 275872

Buggi, I'm thinkin Doug has become a paid pumper a la ephud... or ephud has come back from the great unknown and has possesed Doug's Body...LOL

To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (198008)	5/20/2006 9:27:24 AM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

I'm intrigued by your "looking into the channel" comments in a previous post and, if I've heard you right, seeing almost the opposite of Eric Ross who is calling for a amjor bust by AMD in Q2 owing to their rapid inventory build since the end of Q1. I'm looking at CPU's here: pricewatch.com and see price strengthening in Athlon 64 3200's 3700's and FX 55's and firm pricing elsewhere. Totall inconsistent with the Ross view of the AMD universe. You don't suppose that Ross could be confusing INTC's very serious inventory problem with AMD's do you?