SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (68402)5/21/2006 11:49:36 AM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362827
 
Edwards was on Stephanopolis' show this a.m. saying his candidacy is contigent upon his wife's health first and foremost.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (68402)5/21/2006 12:00:09 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 362827
 
Clark, Edwards, Biden and the rest are also-rans who probably won't win a single primary. All VP hopefuls though. Feingold can't win though lefties love him and he may be the Howard Dean of 2008 if he runs.

Warner is strong and may win. Hillary is strong, but if she loses Iowa and New Hampshire she's through, and Kerry would certainly beat her in NH.

Kerry would make a great president and came very close to being the first one to ever beat a war-time president. Any mistakes he made he has also learned from and will come back stronger and more self-assured.

Also, Kerry can never again be attacked with those phony smearvet charges. Those lies would be laughed at if the GOP tried to use them a second time. So he can show his military credentials unimpeded by smears next time.

Also, we will hear more about how Bush cheated in Ohio in 2004. There is a lot of evidence which hasn't come out in the MSM yet. But it might soon. At the very least the election was a lot closer than the official tally.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (68402)5/21/2006 2:31:03 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362827
 
how about hillary?