Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (6660)	5/23/2006 5:40:48 AM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217677

Some adjustments to risk profile might be within sectors, like this - In Gold Safest - NEM, GG Newmont and Goldcorp - These guys makes loads even at $500 gold, and are multi country. Medium - FCX Freepot McMoran Low Cost, but ONE big mine in Indonesia. Risky - heavy Peru exposure, high costs of bad hedges ABX Barrick, lots of smaller players ********* So we might see a shift to larger, lower cost, multi-country, and more stable country mines. We can see a similar event for energy. This would not be a bad outcome, as the riskier and more obscure stocks would be pushed down to chaep levels.