Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (187112)	5/23/2006 2:56:46 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

There is no debate on GW... In other words, the debate, it over. It's just over. Climate change is here, it's scarier than we thought, we're causing it, and (especially in combination with other large-scale environmental and social problems) it's going to demand radical innovation and major reforms. those questioning the scientific consensus at this point probably have another agenda... what's yours? Message 22478412

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (187112)	5/23/2006 4:31:07 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

If the world water levels have risen so much, then you should have no problems finding submerged cities along all coasts and not just off the coast of Egypt...where are the lost Irish ruins? How about submerged Inca cities? Where is the ancient Chinese Atlantis? On a related note...it makes zero difference whether or not global warming is man-made. You are implying an argument similar to a steel worker who gets lung cancer from exposure to sulfuric fumes and says he should not quit smoking because that was not the primary cause of his cancer...whatever the cause of global warming, we have to do what we can to prevent it or at least slow it down.