SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (289771)6/1/2006 9:02:34 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571120
 
Difference is that the press wasn't allowed in to monitor WWII.



To: TimF who wrote (289771)6/1/2006 9:12:40 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571120
 
This isn't about the Dachau massacre, O'Reilly was using another one that starts with an M. And he was totally wrong about it.

But instead of doing a mea culpa O'Reilly repeated the lie and made some excuse like "Some Nazis got mowed down later". What a crock. O'Reilly should be taken off the air for that one. right up there with his sexual harrassment.

One thing this proves is that O'Reilly can be as full of it as anyone else, though he tries to come off as the honest expert. In fact, I find he has a fairly poor record on accuracy and honesty. and he certainly spins. He is definitely pro-Bush, though he pretends he is neutral.



To: TimF who wrote (289771)6/8/2006 2:41:07 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571120
 
Your partisanship shows once again.......you will defend a rightie to the death even if he's wrong. It wasn't Dachau; it was Malmédy.........80+ American POWs were killed by the SS. Rightie O'Reilly said it was the other way around.......Americans massacred Germans. A viewer wrote in and said he was wrong. O'Reilly continued to disagree and insisted he was right. As in 1984, Fox expunged the offending statement out of the transcript so that it reads correctly even if the primadonna disagrees.

Here's a link on Malmédy:

historynet.com