Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (188291)	6/4/2006 7:34:47 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Just little "pawns" in your little global chess game, aren't they.. the people of the Mid-East.. Pawns are more important. You can count the dead pawns. Bush doesn't even bother to count the dead Iraqis. Just continue facilitating dictators and monarchs who are so corrupt that people become so cynical that they yearn for "cleansing" hand of Jihad... Reagan had great experience with Saddam. He even provided cover for Saddam after he gassed the Kurds. Let's not forget Nixon, Pinocet was just his kind of guy. And to be bi-partisan I'll thow in Carter for supporting the Shah. Bush Sr. doesn't get off the hook, he kept sending biological agents to Saddam after the Kurds and watched while Saddam slaughtered the Shia. How about that "joke" the CIA dude told Congress....We'll fight the Soviets to the last Afghan...what a knee slapper that was. Remember Vietnam? ..... Here's what Nixon and Kissinger were telling communist China and Hanoi..... President Nixon's envoy told Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, "If we can live with a communist government in China, we ought to be able to accept it in Indochina." Kissinger told Zhou the United States respected its Hanoi enemy as a "permanent factor" and probably the "strongest entity" in the region. "And we have had no interest in destroying it or even defeating it," Pressed by Zhou, Kissinger further acknowledged that a communist takeover by force might be tolerated if it happened long enough after a U.S. withdrawal. ------------------------------------------------------ What a great plan. It's ok, if you wait a bit. You know why they did that. So you weenies could say: "We, won. South Vietnam lost." And what was Nixon telling the American people while he and Kissinger were yacking it up with China and Hanoi? Hey, how about that vibrant democracy, Saudi Arabia? That's the democracy where Bush Jr. does kissy face with the Saudi Prince. Take a look at the State Department description of human rights violations in Saudi Arabia. Execution by public beheading, cutting off the right hand and left foot of a thief. The damn Saudis are printing books to teach their people to hate infidels. That would be us. What does Bush do? Kissy face for oil. 15 of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis or haven't you figured out what that means. And if Iraq's democracy fails, what will you propose to replace it?? Oh yeah.. that's right.. it's not your problem, so you don't have to come up with solutions.. Sorry kid. Weak move. Bush is President and is an ABYSMAL FAILURE. HIS FOREIGN POLICY IS A FAILURE. HIS DOMESTIC POLICY IS A FAILURE. IRAQ IS A FAILURE. NORTH KOREA IS A FAILURE. BORDER CONTROL IS A FAILURE. jttmab