SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (188357)6/5/2006 11:25:13 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
However, I DO SEE the Jihadists winning if we follow your idea of completely pulling out. In fact, it practically guarantees that a civil war will ensue, possibly becoming a regional war between Sunni countries and Iran.

And that we nearly agree on. "My idea" isn't going to determine whether we stay in Iraq or not. I don't get any media time and the White House isn't calling me for my opinion. Are they calling you?

Listen you spineless, liberal sock puppet.. You're talking about getting elected, and I'm talking about what is required to defeat the enemy.

That's what happens in a democracy, politicians get elected. As I said before, my individual opinion doesn't matter, nor does yours. What matters is what the collective thinks and the politicians react to the collective. Isn't that supposed to be what democracy is about, The will of the people. Watch Murtha's re-election. That will give you a marker for the state of the spineless, liberal sock puppets in his district.

We can forget about all this stuff for now. Bush is going to be on the TV at 1:45 ET to talk to us about fearing the homosexuals. It gets Iraq off the headlines. It's far more important than the Jihadists.

And remember, you'll always be able to fall back on ... We won, the Iraqis lost.

jttmab