SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gzubeck who wrote (200472)6/5/2006 11:57:51 AM
From: AK2004Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Speculation Grows as Intel's Restructuring Continues

* Highlighted in several recent press reports, speculation is growing as to
what Intel's (INTC, Buy, $18.23) strategic review will mean for its many
struggling divisions outside of microprocessors. Some reports are expecting
an announcement as early as June 15, although we believe that date may be a
little early, as Intel announced at its Spring Analyst Day on April 27 that
the review would take approximately 90 days to complete. However, with the
start date unknown, more information on Intel's plans should be available
shortly.
* Specific speculation is that a reduction in force of approximately 16,000, or
16%, will be announced as well as the efforts to find buyers for several of
the firm's money-losing divisions.
* Targeted division are likely to include the firm's Xscale processor group,
which has made some significant inroads into high-end PDAs and Smartphones,
but has had little success in breaching the mainstream handset market,
dominated by Texas Instruments and Qualcomm. In our view, if Intel decides to
exit the wireless application processor market, its efforts to become a
handset baseband supplier will cease as well. While Intel has had moderate
Xscale success, its position as a baseband supplier has been disappointing.
* IXP network and communications processors are also likely to be on the
chopping block, as Intel has also had little success at competing with the
more complete solutions from companies such as Broadcom and Marvell, as well
as many of the specialty communications companies, such as PMC-Sierra or
Applied Micro Circuits.
* Of course, Intel's NOR Flash participation is an area of perennial
speculation. With AMD exiting NOR Flash, we have argued the company has
little reason to maintain this losing operation, although finding a buyer may
be difficult. NAND Flash players find NOR to be a slower growth and less
attractive market; a sale to Spansion is highly unlikely and the only other
major NOR Flash vendor, STMicroelectronics, has also been looking at a
possible exit. Therefore, Intel's only remaining options may be a partnership
joint venture of some type, or an attempt to unload the division to the
market.
* Regardless of the specifics, we believe the Street will view almost any move
by Intel as a step in the right direction. We believe head count reduction
and division cuts will go a long way toward the firm goal of cutting at least
$1 billion in operating expenses, which would be a significant contributor to
improved earnings leverage. At this point, and at this valuation, we believe
investors need to see Intel becoming more aggressive and more proactive at
reestablishing its position in the industry. If Intel's can begin to do so,
we believe its shares will respond positively, all else being equal.

Source: Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. research



To: gzubeck who wrote (200472)6/5/2006 12:10:09 PM
From: combjellyRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
"What happens if its easier to ratchet up two single cores that kicks ass..."

It probably is. I wonder why they didn't do this.



To: gzubeck who wrote (200472)6/6/2006 6:26:01 AM
From: Dan3Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: What happens if its easier to ratchet up two single cores that kicks ass...then two sockets would look very attractive to buyer and seller..

That's the best idea I've heard in a while.

Dual core is going to be as useless as Itanium untill a decade of ground up software re-writes have taken place.

It's not like 64-bit where you can get huge benefits from a simple re-compile.

There is so much marketing behind dual core from both companies that AMD needed a solution that provides a second core, but a faster single core is better for 99% of the next 5 year's software.