Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (12747)	6/6/2006 1:24:37 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78416

Koan I agree. But Dak makes good points. Let's let it rest. It is okay to post this stuff on occasion but not beat it into the ground. You and DAK are just pissed because neither of you have any ARU! <g> Me neither. LOL.

To: koan who wrote (12747)	6/6/2006 1:38:30 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78416

<You were rationalizing why discrimination against a group who are a bit different is Ok.> No, I'm wondering why a minority group wants to change the meaning of a word in the English language? <YOu are starting the fight by denying a group of people their civil rights> No I'm not... 1.) I think Gays should have every right anyone else has. Everyone else does NOT have the right to be called a member of the Augusta country club or any other private organization. The word Marriage is linked to churches unfortunately. 2.) The "fight" is doing fine without me, as I said, I don't care one way or the other. Churches will probably just officially change the name of "marriage" to "holy marriage" or "holy Matrimony" or some such thing if the word "marriage" becomes institutionalized to mean anyone living together in some legal way. I really don't care who wins this.... my point is if Gay lobby groups has fought for verbage like "union" instead of "marriage", they would already have status. Too bad. <Why do you not want the gay community to have the same marriage rights as everyone else DAK?> I've only said a million times I think gays should have all the rights everyone has... you continued attack that I MUST be against gay rights is nasty and abusive, and clueless... "Marriage" isn't my word... why can't I be called as president of IBM be called "Pope", Bishop, or "Priest"? Why can't I be a prince??? <This effort by Bush to ban gay marriage is so stupid and venel(yes stupid and venel)I just cannot believe anyone cannot see if for what it is.> I have no idea what Bush wants... I"m telling you how gays can get what one would THINK they want. Unless they just want to fight. DAK