Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (188584)	6/6/2006 5:29:28 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hence, we can deduce that the original was written by the non-existent and disbanded USA official Office of Disinformation. It was written in 2004. Maurice.. apparently, given your attitude, you wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face. I suppose none of those suicide bombers who are blowing up Mosques, schools, and police stations are real either?? All part of the "office of disinformation"?? Which btw, WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO PRODUCE SUCH A DOCUMENT since it's only purpose would have been to persuade Americans, and other nations, about Saddam's complicity in 9/11. And I wasn't part of any OOD. I saw documents describing AQ and Iraq ties. And they were captured documents. And you do a GRAVE DISHONOR to the members of the teams (MCTs) who risked (as well as gave) their lives to collect them from their hiding places. Why is it so hard for you to believe that Saddam had a vested interest in co-opting Bin Laden and Zawahiri in order to strike at his two greatest enemies, the US and Saudi Arabia (with Iran coming in third)?? Why is it so hard for you to believe that IIS personnel have been acting as senior leadership amongst the Jihadists?? Are you being deliberately dense?? Hawk