Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (68614)	6/12/2006 3:55:43 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

they're still rounding up people from info from Zarqawi. foxnews.com foxnews.com but, you're right, you have to dig for good news...

To: one_less who wrote (68614)	6/12/2006 4:11:52 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

But don't you think since they had him in their sights that US military units in the area could have captured him and documentation instead of killing him? There's something else curious about this. Remember in the pre-war runup how Bush-Cheney, et. al., made a big deal out of al-Zarqawi being in Baghdad to have his leg amputated from an Afghanstan war injury, and that this was supposedly part of the Saddam-Al Qaeda connection? Afterwards he retreated to the Kurdish controlled northeastern portion of Iraq, deep within the US-imposed No-Fly Zone and near Iran. Bush could have killed him then, and didn't. Eventually, US intelligence analysts, around 2004, gave Zarqawi his leg back and I guess this is why there was no mention of his leg injury when they found him at the bomb site. Botton line is that Bush wants a 'bogyman' and he still has OBL. And another bottom line is that the little girl that was killed in that airstrike doesn't seem to matter to Americans.