Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (54500)	6/13/2006 9:48:37 AM
From: Proud Deplorable	Respond to of 313090

"I have no doubt it was a side effect of the two tower collapses" THAT'S RIDICULOUS

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (54500)	6/13/2006 10:13:39 AM
From: luds	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 313090

perhaps you should stop embarrasing yourself with your repungent view of this staged event used only to kickstart the recall of your constitution

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (54500)	6/13/2006 12:41:53 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 313090

At least 350 feet away and no seismic activity from the others falling. and a full 7 hours later. Frankly I and most other people with even a pea sized brain are tired of having the truth labeled as "conspiracy BS" by someone who buries their head in the sand and refuses to analyze the facts. Its not becoming to you. By the way, I railed against the Iraq thingy years ago and everyone said I was nuts. No one in their right mind says Iraq was the right thing to do these days. This has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with politics,its engineering and physics. Who knows who demolished the buildings. I certainly don't but there is much more to this story and we are not being told the truth by governments.