SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)6/13/2006 7:02:07 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Democrats have no significant corruption issues. Take away lone wolf Jefferson and you have almost nothing.

Compare to the the GOP where every single rightwing congressional leader is either indicted, under serious investigation or tied to Abramoff and DElay. Plus the corruption spreads far into the White House, through Rove on up to Bush personally.

Then we get into the even bigger corruption issues regarding the gas gouging, Saudis, Enron, Exxon, Halliburton, Dubai Ports and Carlyle Group.



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)6/13/2006 7:04:20 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Kerry spokesman rips into 'porcine' Rove

Published: Tuesday June 13, 2006

A spokesman for Senator John Kerry (D-MA) has launched an unusually personal attack on presidential adviser Karl Rove, RAW STORY has learned.

The move comes one day after Rove called plans to exit Iraq proposed by Senator Kerry and Representative John Murtha (D-PA) "profoundly wrong" "cut and run" strategies. "They may be with you for the first few bullets," Rove said, "but they won't be there for the last tough battles."

Both Kerry and Murtha are decorated service veterans.

"The closest Karl Rove ever came to combat," said Kerry spokesman David Wade, "was these last months spent worrying his cellmates might rough him up in prison. This porcine political operative can't cut and run from the truth any longer."

Wade continued: "When it came to Iraq, this Administration chose to cut and run from sound intelligence and good diplomacy, cut and run from the best military advice, cut and run from their responsibility to give our troops body armor, and in November Americans will cut and run from this Republican Congress."



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)6/13/2006 9:29:21 PM
From: lorneRespond to of 81568
 
The gods are laughing
Tom Harris, National Post
Published: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
canada.com

Albert Einstein once said, "Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of truth and knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."

While the gods must consider An Inconvenient Truth the ultimate comedy, real climate scientists are crying over Al Gore's new film. This is not just because the ex-vice-president commits numerous basic science mistakes. They are also concerned that many in the media and public will fail to realize that this film amounts to little more than science fiction.

Gore's credibility is damaged early in the film when he tells the audience that, by simply looking at Antarctic ice cores with the naked eye, one can see when the American Clean Air Act was passed. Dr. Ian Clark, professor of Earth Sciences at the University of Ottawa (U of O) responds, "This is pure fantasy unless the reporter is able to detect parts per billion changes to chemicals in ice." Air over the United States doesn't even circulate to the Antarctic before mixing with most of the northern, then the southern, hemisphere air, and this process takes decades. Clark explains that even far more significant events, such as the settling of dust arising from the scouring of continental shelves at the end of ice ages, are undetectable in ice cores by an untrained eye.

Gore repeatedly labels carbon dioxide as "global warming pollution" when, in reality, it is no more pollution than is oxygen. CO2 is plant food, an ingredient essential for photosynthesis without which Earth would be a lifeless, frozen ice ball. The hypothesis that human release of CO2 is a major contributor to global warming is just that -- an unproven hypothesis, against which evidence is increasingly mounting.

In fact, the correlation between CO2 and temperature that Gore speaks about so confidently is simply non-existent over all meaningful time scales. U of O climate researcher Professor Jan Veizer demonstrated that, over geologic time, the two are not linked at all. Over the intermediate time scales Gore focuses on, the ice cores show that CO2 increases don't precede, and therefore don't cause, warming. Rather, they follow temperature rise -- by as much as 800 years. Even in the past century, the correlation is poor; the planet actually cooled between 1940 and 1980, when human emissions of CO2 were rising at the fastest rate in our history.

Similarly, the fact that water vapour constitutes 95% of greenhouse gases by volume is conveniently ignored by Gore. While humanity's three billion tonnes (gigatonnes, or GT) per year net contribution to the atmosphere's CO2 load appears large on a human scale, it is actually less than half of 1% of the atmosphere's total CO2 content (750-830 GT). The CO2 emissions of our civilization are also dwarfed by the 210 GT/year emissions of the gas from Earth's oceans and land. Perhaps even more significant is the fact that the uncertainty in the measurement of atmospheric CO2 content is 80 GT -- making three GT seem hardly worth mentioning.

But Gore persists, labeling future CO2 rises as "deeply unethical" and lectures the audience, "Each one of us is a cause of global warming." Not satisfied with simply warning of human-induced killer heat waves -- events in Europe this past year were "like a nature hike through the Book of Revelations," he says -- he then uses high-tech special effects to show how human-caused climate changes are causing more hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, infectious diseases, insect plagues, glacial retreats, coral die-outs and the flooding of small island nations due to sea level rise caused by the melting of the polar caps. One is left wondering if Gore thinks nature is responsible for anything
Scientists who actually work in these fields flatly contradict Gore. Take his allegations that extreme weather (EW) events will increase in frequency and severity as the world warms and that this is already happening. Former professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg Dr. Tim Ball notes, "The theories that Gore supports indicate the greatest warming will be in polar regions. Therefore, the temperature contrast with warmer regions -- the driver of extreme weather -- will lessen and, with it, storm potential will lessen."

This is exactly what former Environment Canada research scientist and EW specialist Dr. Madhav Khandekar found. His studies show there has been no increase in EW events in Canada in the past 25 years. Furthermore, he sees no indication that such events will increase over the next 25 years. "In fact, some EW events such as winter blizzards have definitely declined," Khandekar says. "Prairie droughts have been occurring for hundreds of years. The 13th and 16th century saw some of the severest and longest droughts ever on Canadian/American prairies." Like many other researchers, Khandekar is convinced that EW is not increasing globally, either.

On hurricanes, Gore implies that new records are being set as a result of human greenhouse gas emissions. Besides clumsy errors in the presentation of the facts (Katrina did not get "stronger and stronger and stronger" as it came over the Gulf of Mexico; rather, it was category 5 over the ocean and was downgraded to category 3 when it made a landfall), Gore fails to note that the only region to show an increase in hurricanes in recent years is the North Atlantic. Hurricane specialist Tad Murty, former senior research scientist Department of Fisheries and Oceans and now adjust professor of Earth sciences at U of O, points out, "In all other six ocean basins where tropical cyclones occur, there is either a flat or a downward trend." Murty lists 1900, 1926 and 1935 as the years in which the most intense hurricanes were recorded in the United States. In fact, Max Mayfield, director of the National Hurricane Center in Miami, has stated that global warming has nothing to do with the recent increase in hurricane frequency in the North Atlantic. Murty concludes, "The feeling among many meteorologists is that it has to do with the North Atlantic oscillation, which is now in the positive phase and will continue for another decade or so."
In their open letter to the Prime Minister in April, 61 of the world's leading experts modestly expressed their understanding of the science: "The study of global climate change is an 'emerging science,' one that is perhaps the most complex ever tackled. It may be many years yet before we properly understand the Earth's climate system." It seems that liberal arts graduate Al Gore, political champion of the Kyoto Protocol, thinks he knows better.

Institut Pasteur (Paris) Professor Paul Reiter seemed to sum up the sentiments of many experts when he labelled the film "pure, mind-bending propaganda." Such reactions should certainly cause Canadians to wonder if Nobel Prize-winning French novelist Andre Gide had a point when he advised, "Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."

- Tom Harris is a mechanical engineer and Ottawa director of High Park Group, a public affairs and public policy company.

SEA LEVEL FALLING, POLAR BEARS STABLE, ICE CAPS THICKENING ...

"I can assure Mr. Gore that no one from the South Pacific islands has fled to New Zealand because of rising seas. In fact, if Gore consults the data, he will see it shows sea level falling in some parts of the Pacific." -- Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, University of Auckland, N.Z.

- - -

"We find no alarming sea level rise going on, in the Maldives, Tovalu, Venice, the Persian Gulf and even satellite altimetry, if applied properly." -- Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics and geodynamics, Stockholm University, Sweden.

- - -

"Gore is completely wrong here -- malaria has been documented at an altitude of 2,500 metres -- Nairobi and Harare are at altitudes of about 1,500 metres. The new altitudes of malaria are lower than those recorded 100 years ago. None of the "30 so-called new diseases" Gore references are attributable to global warming, none." -- Dr. Paul Reiter, professor, Institut Pasteur, unit of insects and infectious diseases, Paris, comments on Gore's belief that Nairobi and Harare were founded just above the mosquito line to avoid malaria and how the mosquitoes are now moving to higher altitudes.

- - -

"Our information is that seven of 13 populations of polar bears in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (more than half the world's estimated total) are either stable or increasing..... Of the three that appear to be declining, only one has been shown to be affected by climate change. No one can say with certainty that climate change has not affected these other populations, but it is also true that we have no information to suggest that it has." -- Dr. Mitchell Taylor, manager, wildlife research section, Department of Environment, Igloolik, Nunavut.

- - -

"Mr. Gore suggests that the Greenland melt area increased considerably between 1992 and 2005. But 1992 was exceptionally cold in Greenland and the melt area of ice sheet was exceptionally low due to the cooling caused by volcanic dust emitted from Mt. Pinatubo. If, instead of 1992, Gore had chosen for comparison the year 1991, one in which the melt area was 1% higher than in 2005, he would have to conclude that the ice sheet melt area is shrinking and that perhaps a new Ice Age is just around the corner." -- Dr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax.
"The oceans are now heading into one of their periodic phases of cooling.... Modest changes in temperature are not about to wipe them [coral] out. Neither will increased carbon dioxide, which is a fundamental chemical building block that allows coral reefs to exist at all." -- Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, Calif.

- - -

"Both the Antarctic and Greenland ice caps are thickening. The temperature at the South Pole has declined by more than one degree C since 1950. And the area of sea ice around the continent has increased over the last 20 years." -- Dr. R.M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

- - -

"From data published by the Canadian Ice Service, there has been no precipitous drop-off in the amount or thickness of the ice cap since 1970 when reliable overall coverage became available for the Canadian Arctic." -- Dr./Cdr. M.R. Morgan, FRMS, formerly advisor to the World Meteorological Organization/climatology research scientist at University of Exeter, U.K.

- - -

"The MPB (mountain pine beetle) is a species native to this part of North America and is always present. The MPB epidemic started as comparatively small outbreaks and through forest management inaction got completely out of hand." -- Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, B.C., comments on Gore's belief that the mountain pine beetle is an "invasive exotic species" that has become a plague due to fewer days of frost.



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)6/13/2006 10:25:09 PM
From: ChinuSFORespond to of 81568
 
Poll: "Had enough?" Not Enough to Lift Congressional Dems to Power

With control of Congress on the line this fall, GOP is down but not yet out, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows

Voters nationwide are unhappy with Republican-led Washington right now, but Democrats haven't convinced them to make sweeping changes on Capitol Hill, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows.

While they hold a significant advantage over the GOP, Democrats muster support from barely half of those respondents when asked whether "Republicans deserve to retain control of Congress, or is it time for the Democrats to take over and run things?" just 30% said they think Republicans deserve to stay in charge.

The telephone survey of likely voters, conducted June 2-6, 2006, included 1,028 respondents and carries a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points.

Democrats are seen as the better party to handle most important issues facing the nation, the poll shows, with the notable exception of fighting terrorism, where Republicans continue to retain a double-digit edge.

And while voters followed a traditional pattern of giving their own representative a positive job performance rating while at the same time giving negative marks to Congress as a whole, fewer than half (49%) gave their own congressman a positive job rating. Those living in districts with Republican congressmen gave them a 53% positive job rating and a 43% negative rating, while those living in districts represented by Democrats gave their congressmen a 51% positive and a 48% negative rating. Just 21% give Congress in general a positive job approval rating. Pollster John Zogby, President and CEO of Zogby International, said such numbers could be the foundation for a strong anti–incumbent mood swing that could cut against both Democrats and Republicans.

Asked if the nation would be better off if Democrats win control of Congress, 43% said "yes," while 25% said it would be worse off, and 25% said it would make no difference. Fewer said they thought their own personal situation would improve if Democrats were to take over the committee chairmanships on Capitol Hill.

Pollster John Zogby: "Democrats still have some homework to do. By a factor of 40% to 29%, voters would choose Democrats in their congressional elections, but note that better than one in four are still undecided. That is very significant.

"The Democrats do well on several issues, but they do particularly well on their own issues - the economy, health care, Social Security, that sort of thing. However, when it comes to Republican issues - taxes, family values, and dealing with terrorism - Republicans are either tied or slightly ahead. Paint me as one who is not sure we're going to have a landslide. We may, but the results are too mixed right now to say for sure.

"Democrats appear to be picking up support from investors, veterans, married respondents, frequent WalMart shoppers, and NASCAR fans. But to win control of Congress, they would have to target Middle America - those voters who are not in their natural support base. That's not to say they have to stop being Democrats, but they have to have a program on taxes. They have to have a program on government spending. And it is clear to me that they have to come out in opposition to the war. Not only is that what the overwhelming majority of Democrats want, that's what a majority of the American

"If the congressional campaigns this year are run on terrorism and taxes, Republicans will win. If they are run on gas prices, education, health care and the environment, Democrats will win. What intrigued me is that, when it comes to ethics in government, there is almost no difference between how the parties are perceived. There is apparently no advantage for Democrats to go down that 'culture of corruption' road.

"Clearly a weakness that the Republicans have is President Bush. In this poll, when we look at President Bush, not only do we see him at 31% positive overall job performance rating, which is lowest we have ever had for him, but we also see the coalition of supporters who supported his election and reelection is crumbling. He wins just a 48% positive job approval among born-again Christians, but we also see lows among conservatives, Republicans, veterans, WalMart shoppers, and among NASCAR fans. Right now, the President is a burden for the Republican Party heading into the midterm elections."

Just 29% said they think the nation is heading in the right direction, down from 36% last month and 43% a year ago.

With intra-party squabbles over immigration policy badly splitting the Republicans, just 25% said that if they differed with their own party leaders on the issue that is most important to them, they would overlook that difference and vote for their party's congressional candidate anyway.

Nearly six in 10 (59%) Republicans said they would either vote for the Democrat, for a third party candidate, or would not vote in the race at all.

In this new Zogby poll, 31% of Republicans ranked immigration as a top issue facing the nation today. It was second only to the Iraq war. While Democrats also considered the war the top issue facing the nation, they considered jobs and the economy to be more important than immigration.

zogby.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)6/29/2006 5:47:09 PM
From: American SpiritRespond to of 81568
 
Corruption News: Jeb Bush uses phony charity to fund campaign (Delay,. Frist and Santorum all have similar slush funds posing as charities. Bush used Enron as his slush fund.)
palmbeachpost.printthis.clickability.com



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)9/3/2006 12:55:22 AM
From: American SpiritRespond to of 81568
 
We are now officially worse off without Saddam in power.
It has become clear now that Saddam hated Al Qaida. Killed Islamic nuts. Filled graves with them. Held that crazy country together by knocking heads. And would even deal with Halliburton, as did Iran, illegally if necessary. Plus, saddam was the only one crazy enough to stay at war with Iran for years taking the casualties for no sane reason, despite the fact Iran is three times bigger.

Bush, you blew it. You should have ENLISTED saddam in the war on terror. Bribed him to help us. See? Bushies are stupid.



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)9/29/2006 8:15:42 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
MSNBC: New witness to Allen using N word. On Countdown, Virginia woman says she had a public argument with Allen witnessed by others about his constant use of the N word.

So much for Allen's denials. Like Bush-Cheney, he's a proven liar.

New poll shows tie in Virginia. Bushies are freaking out. Allen's racism could mean losing control of the senate.



To: LindyBill who wrote (77100)11/2/2006 5:39:50 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Bush's #1 Evangelical In Colorado Busted For Gay Hooker Sex
and Meth Use

rawstory.com

This is a big story in COlorado and the Rockies today, the news media have finally picked it up. The gay escort is undergoing a lie detector test and playing the evangelical creep's voicemail tapes on talk radio in Denver tomorrow to prove it.