Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (169793)	6/13/2006 10:33:43 PM
From: Jagfan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793905

So what's your explaination of what has been found? -500 tons...that's right...TONS...make that 1million pounds of yellow cake uranium. It was found at Saddam's nuclear weapons facility (yup...he had one of those too.) -1.8 tons of partially enriched uranium found at the same place. You know, the stuff you need to make nukes. -Hidden centrifuge parts and blueprints. -Two dozen artillery shells loaded with Sarin and mustard gas. Sounds like WMD to me!

To: Ilaine who wrote (169793)	6/13/2006 10:33:44 PM
From: Jagfan	Respond to of 793905

So what's your explaination of what has been found? -500 tons...that's right...TONS...make that 1million pounds of yellow cake uranium. It was found at Saddam's nuclear weapons facility (yup...he had one of those too.) -1.8 tons of partially enriched uranium found at the same place. You know, the stuff you need to make nukes. -Hidden centrifuge parts and blueprints. -Two dozen artillery shells loaded with Sarin and mustard gas. Sounds like WMD to me!

To: Ilaine who wrote (169793)	6/13/2006 10:40:32 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793905

First, October 2002 was 6 months before the war, and three months before the State of the Union Address, in which Bush claimed that Saddam had attempted to purchase uranium in Niger Yep. And the British White Paper and all the investigation into claims about Niger were done before October 2002's forgeries from Italian intel. I gather you haven't read any of the many documents I've linked. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink I have, but I wonder if you have. It seems we're not reading the same documents. Or you're just drawing the wrong conclusions, like your misquoting of Tenet, and your blatantly wrong timeline and attribution of the Niger intel to the forgeries found by Italy. Its fine if you don't want to continue, its boring having to go over this again and again. Derek