Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (189299)	6/14/2006 12:48:48 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Would you be happier if Israel went on the rampage and left nothing but piles of skulls, plugged wells, and salted soil? You know, the Ghengis Khan trip? I don't find that acceptable. We could win in Iraq tomorrow that way. I still don't find it acceptable.

To: Elroy who wrote (189299)	6/14/2006 12:49:19 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

This post is incoherent.

To: Elroy who wrote (189299)	6/14/2006 6:27:46 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Also, it's been 60 years and the neighbors of Israel still don't accept its existence, and Israel (in 60 years, 3 generations of humans) has failed to either destroy or make peace with its enemies. That alone says to me there is something really messed up in its creation. ...or with its neighbors. It takes two to tango. You do realize, don't you, that if Israel had followed the Turkish model and worked on completely ethnically clearing its territory of all non-Jews, it would likely be in a much stronger position today, with well established borders? Israel had the power to do this in 1948 and 1967, but refrained.