Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (189304)	6/14/2006 12:53:05 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Probably England should have kept their empire,and we should have made Texas Israel :>)

To: michael97123 who wrote (189304)	6/14/2006 1:03:18 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

should refrain from that i guess but your failure to cut the isrealis even the smallest break back in 1947 annoys me. The UN did the partition. You love the UN, right? Why would I love the UN? I've said that in the UN vote for establishment of Israel the "no" votes of all the neighbors should be given more weight than they were. Who cares if Bolivia votes to establish Israel 6000 miles away when Egypt on the border says no? And I don't know what you mean by cut them a break. I think the basic idea of a country founded on exclusion (we are a Jewish nation) rather than inclusion (we accept all peoples) is wrong. In Israel's case particularly wrong because there were plenty of non-Jews there when it came into being....