SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Metacomet who wrote (10725)6/16/2006 2:35:55 AM
From: Taikun  Respond to of 25575
 
<They lose 40% of their concession each year.>

Initially I was worried about this but when I found out their mining claims (rights and not Alberta-style leases as Haitokin pointed out) were acquired for free, I realized that aside from opportunity cost they aren't losing much as long as they can flesh out some kind of resource on the most promising lands. Of course, some investors valuing them on their land package alone might be surprised to see the expiration rate.

OTOH, when Sask unveils its new oil sands lease program, could CWPC's remaining claims be open to revaluation under the new pricing program? Or perhaps they wont have rights in the future.



To: Metacomet who wrote (10725)6/19/2006 10:55:47 AM
From: candlestick98765  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25575
 
Metacomet -- the two redemptions have left the company with 508,000 acres. That's it. There are no more redemptions. This land is now securely theirs. With their recent drilling program (plus the one currently on-going), that have met (and will more than met) the permitting requirements, so that one can more or less say that the 508,00 acres will now be held in perpetuity.

If this is indeed the case, then the premise of your analysis is false, and your argument entirely invalid.

I just got off the phone with IR, and this is what I was told. If you have different information, I'd like to have it sourced. TIA

candles