SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77544)6/23/2006 4:34:12 PM
From: sea_biscuitRespond to of 81568
 
Jan-June 2005 US troop deaths were higher than that for Jan-June 2004. The Jan-June 2006 numbers are a little lower but there is no pattern. This is a battle of attrition and the numbers can rise and fall along the way. Over the next 5-10 years, you will see for yourself that there's really no pattern to the numbers. And over the next 10-20 years, you will see a gradual upward gradient a la Vietnam.

The Iraqi resistance has no choice but to keep fighting. Unlike USSA, they cannot pack up and go home; they are already home. So they will keep fighting as long as we are there.

Looks like our rulers have decided that 2-3 US soldiers a day is a small price to pay for the corporate control of Iraq and its resources. And as long as the 2-3 soldiers are not your kids, do you regressive flag-wavers really care?! Of course not.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77544)6/23/2006 5:43:22 PM
From: CogitoRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
>>They're not trending upward. 2005 casualties were 25% lower than 2004 casualties; 2006 casualties are trending lower than 2005.<<

Nadine -

I stand corrected.

Costs are still on an uptrend, however.

- Allen