SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77596)6/24/2006 9:55:52 AM
From: sea_biscuitRespond to of 81568
 
Unlike the USSA, even though the British have screwed up in many places, they have the sense, at least sometimes, to not do so.

Take the case of India. They kept it relatively stable for two centuries. They were not rash in handling Gandhi.

If USSA was in charge, they would have sent Gandhi to Gitmo calling him a "terrorist" and tortured him. That would have resulted in a lot more US soldiers getting killed and the USSA would have been kicked out a lot sooner.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77596)6/24/2006 1:01:16 PM
From: RichnorthRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Note that as in Iraq, the ideology and many of the fighters on the Communist side were also foreign.

To be the sure, the Communist ideology was foreign to the people in Malaya. But most of the fighters were home-grown!!!
Not foreigners!!!

I know this for a fact because, having been in Malaysia (formerly Malaya) myself for a number of years, I am acquainted with the history of that country.

The British created Force 136 and the MPAJA (Malayan People's Anti-Japanese Army) mainly from local people. There were relatively few foreigners. Because the Communist fighting force were mostly local Chinese they blended very well with the local populace and the British had a hard time tracking them down.

The Communists engaged mostly in guerilla warfare and, needless to say, they drew a lot from the experience of the late Chairman Mao and his Long March fighters in China.

I commend the British for having handled the situation in Malaya (before it became Malaysia in 1957) creditably well.

BTW, British diplomacy also managed to get the Sunnis and the Shia in Iraq to live in peaceful co-existence. This is a far cry from what the Americans and Israelis are doing in the Middle East.

Bush will do well to learn from the British and to stop acting as if the only opinion that matters is what he and his opine.
.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77596)6/24/2006 1:04:35 PM
From: OrcastraiterRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Note that as in Iraq, the ideology and many of the fighters on the Communist side were also foreign.

Note that in Iraq, there are actually very few foreign fighters, less than 5% of the insurgents. There are few foreign fighters in Iraq, not many.

We might have to change your name to Nadine Cheney.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77596)6/24/2006 2:18:01 PM
From: CogitoRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
>>Can you provide an example of a democracy that was created by a foreign army fighting an unconventional war?

Yes, the British in Malaysia 1948 - 1960<<

Nadine -

Great. So we maybe we only have about another decade to go in Iraq.

- Allen