To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (42318 ) 6/26/2006 2:57:04 PM From: Scott C. Lemon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771 Hello Paul, It is amazing to see this huge change ... and wonder if there is any way they will ever recover from all of these years of waste. I like the quote that you put in your post, since it so directly points to the mis-alignment of strategy again. Uh ... if Novell does not have the DNA to support communities of developers, then why enter into the Open Source movement? Excuse me, but I really thought that the Open Source movement was all about communities of developers! Another couple of comments, based on local Utah conversations that I have had: 1. The leadership in Provo is MIA. *Everything* is really being done in Cambridge, and I have been told by many people that the Provo campus has become a whole bunch of disconnected teams. Most of these teams report to Cambridge, and simply co-habitate the Provo campus. There is no real energetic, charismatic leadership in Provo. I can't speak for Cambridge. 2. There is a huge resource vacuum in sales. I am hearing the the Novell sales force has been pillaged and has left in so many numbers that constant account interaction is growing to be impossible. Out of sight, out of mind ... when the customer is not constantly being courted by Novell sales people, they begin to look for other partners ... 3. Development resources are also thinning. Again, due to a variety of reasons many of the internal people believe that Novell has left itself extremely thin ... covering too many bases with too few developers. This then slows the ability to iterate products and stay on top of advanced features. It's funny ... I've been watching the stock to see if there was going to be a chance ... I'm not sure there is. At least at this point, even with the regime change, there is still a lot that would have to be done! Scott C. Lemonthe.inevtiable.org