SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (22574)6/29/2006 5:12:09 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543793
 
I don't remember the details offhand, but I was quite surprised at the low limits on both contributions and spending in Vermont. I think the most that could be spent on the campaign for governor was something like $300,000. Makes it tough for a challenger!

Personally, I think that term limits might be a better way to approach any problems of influence peddling. These politicians who get entrenched in office just keep gaining power and those who support them see the payoffs on their "investments" over a longer term.

The playing field would be more level for newcomers to take a turn in office and they would not need as much money to challenge a powerful incumbent.

Just some random thoughts. There is always more than one way to skin a cat, assuming, arguendo that the cat needs to be skinned in the first place!<g>



To: Lane3 who wrote (22574)6/29/2006 5:13:41 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543793
 
Old business: Saw Gore on The Daily Show. He said global warming was much more destructive than a nuclear holocaust. He was downright dismissive of the latter saying that global warming is the only threat we've ever faced that could wipe out civilization or humanity, don't recall which. Whichever it was, he was greatly exaggerating the space between the two, to say the least.

The other thing he said that I found misleading was, when talking about rising water and the maps of Florida, India, etc., he mentioned current refugees and wondered what we'd do with millions. Of course, the people who are flooded out now are all flooded suddenly and at once, not over centuries. He made it seem like we'd have millions of them all at once.

FWIW.



To: Lane3 who wrote (22574)7/1/2006 11:48:29 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543793
 
I'm on the verge on concluding that we should scrap the whole thing, all but the transparency stuff, that is.

My opinion is pretty much the same as what you are on the verge of. If you regulate campaign finance than people find loopholes. If you stamp out the loopholes people find new ones. If you can ever managed to thoroughly stamp out all important loopholes than you wind up restricting political speech.