Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9816)	7/3/2006 6:14:05 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

The problem with the Times is that millions of Americans no longer believe that its editors would make those calculations in anything close to good faith. We certainly don't. On issue after issue, it has become clear that the Times believes the U.S. is not really at war, and in any case the Bush Administration lacks the legitimacy to wage it. There you have the CRUX of the matter and spoken by none other then the Wall Street Journal. Now, does ANYONE REALLY THINK the editors of the NYT's are in any position to decide whether or not we are at war and does anyone believe the PRESIDENT OF THE USA lacks the legitimacy to wage it? IMHO the audacity of the NYT's is beyond believe. jdn