Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (172361)	7/4/2006 12:48:36 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793731

You just read the same Hersh essay I did. First, we have to remember that Hersh is a liberal. Secondly, that He hates Bush and this administration with a passion. Third, That all the "sources" he quotes are never identified. He could be making it up out of whole cloth. Then, balance what he says with what we know. Take away his POV and the arguments Hersh gives about a Military strike sound like what we would want our Gov to be doing. Planning for all options so that they can calculate the risks. Then look at what Hersh says about the non-military options and again take away his POV. That sounds like where we are going. I would be a lot more confident that the non-mil is going to work if they were more involved in propaganda efforts against the Iranian regime. I don't think we are working closely enough with the Iranian exiles on getting broadcasts into Iran to destabilize the regime. In summary, what is my answer? As they say in Hollywood, "nobody knows." :>)