Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Constant Reader who wrote (172947)	7/8/2006 4:01:56 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793727

Would you care to explain this despicable comment? Don't you think that's an interesting angle? It hadn't occurred to me. Maybe it takes a lawyer to think of that. It's presentation may have been a bit flip out of impatience with what provoked it, but it's still an interesting angle.

To: Constant Reader who wrote (172947)	7/8/2006 4:08:59 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793727

Talk about spitting on dead men's graves! Have you no shame? No, it doesn't cause me shame to speculate whether the soldiers who were tortured and killed were tortured and killed because they took part in the rape/murder that occurred earlier. Why should it? Because they're Americans? Should I also be ashamed to speculate that Americans have killed Iraqis in order to get revenge? Is it just the idea that revenge occurs that I should be ashamed of? Or is there some special reason to be ashamed of speculating on revenge against members of the US military?